A Non-research Exercise, on Research
Wednesday October 10, 2018
Let’s say you’re playing a role-playing game where your player-character is a really good researcher.
As a result, every time you roll the dice while solving a problem, bonus points are added to your roll if your solution involves research.
- How does this change the way you play the game?
- How does this change the way you interact with others in the game?
- How does this change the way you manage your time in-game?
- What do you do when you confront a problem that’s not amenable to research?
- How would other characters see your role? Are they right or wrong? How much does it matter?
- Any other insights?
If you have time, write or talk out your own answers. I’ll add my own answers later, too.
Filed in: Productivity /120/ | Te /36/ | Ti /30/ | Thinking /70/
Recent Articles
Just Writing to Write, Just Expressing Because it's Life →
The NT Factor: How Harris and Walz's Personality Types Could Shape Their Presidential Bid and/or Presidency →
Predictive Contenders: Allan Lichtman (ENTP) and Cenk Uygur (INTJ) on US Presidential Election Predictions →
How to Organize & Structure a New Binder or Notebook (Fractal Method) →
Sharpening, Reading, Listening, Watching, Timing. →
Things I Made for You
Own your procrastination with Whole Productivity, a new system → Get my free INTJ COVID-19 Guide → Explore your gifts with my INTJ Workbook → Other Publications → ...and the fake word of the hour: "Lolk." Which I believe is a term used when speaking about feats of daring.